Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67164/67164dd2c0a4166f60840c2f5aeb5d3444f381e6" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 192g - 103 x 62 x 28mm
- Revealed November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic LF1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the LF1 (12MP) is pretty similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and LF1 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The VR-320 was released 3 years earlier than the LF1 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the VR-320 scores against the LF1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Panasonic LF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic LF1
VR-320 | LF1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic LF1 over the Olympus VR-320
LF1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 28 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic LF1
VR-320 | LF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 has got physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic LF1 has specifications of 103mm x 62mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic LF1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 and the LF1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45e15/45e1509e71cc5a45ca8435c05ede3a5e489143a5" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and LF1 is 94 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd9b2/cd9b2ed92066ea2325dc86618904e253eb4144dc" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The pic below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and LF1.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus VR-320 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/082d6/082d6a7a1b2edc65e0e44a645c9a1ffde0b2b0d9" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42258/42258dc638f3bf74186749479f971cf92b8e0c52" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic LF1 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2013-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 192 gr (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 103 x 62 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 211 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $179 | $500 |