Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT2
- Succeeded the Panasonic TS1
- Renewed by Panasonic TS3
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the TS2 (14MP) is relatively similar and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-320 was unveiled 18 months after the TS2 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the VR-320 scores vs the TS2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Panasonic TS2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic TS2
| VR-320 | TS2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 | January 2010 | Newer by 18 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS2 over the Olympus VR-320
| TS2 | VR-320 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic TS2
| VR-320 | TS2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 has physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic TS2 has sizing of 99mm x 63mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-320 compared to the TS2.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and TS2 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading specifications. The image underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and TS2.
Plainly, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of files although you might want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent VR-320 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic TS2 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FT2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-128mm (4.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 188g (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $179 | $350 |