Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS45
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
- Released January 2015
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ57
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS40
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS50
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic ZS45, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the ZS45 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was introduced 4 years earlier than the ZS45 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the VR-320 matches up versus the ZS45 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS45 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Panasonic ZS45 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic ZS45
| VR-320 | ZS45 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus VR-320
| ZS45 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 | July 2011 | More modern by 42 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic ZS45
| VR-320 | ZS45 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 has exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS45 has measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic ZS45 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 versus the ZS45.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and ZS45 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The pic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and ZS45.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Panasonic ZS45 to show more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ57 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2015-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $179 | $300 |