Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K110D
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
67 Imaging
45 Features
30 Overall
39
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Revealed May 2006
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K110D Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax K110D, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and K110D (6MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and K110D (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe VR-320 was brought out 5 years after the K110D which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 grades vs the K110D in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K110D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 and Pentax K110D. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Pentax K110D
VR-320 | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | May 2006 | Newer by 63 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 210k | Clearer screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus VR-320
K110D | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Pentax K110D
VR-320 | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 provides external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Pentax K110D has specifications of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax K110D in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 compared to the K110D.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and K110D is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and K110D.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus VR-320 will render more detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher VR-320 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K110D Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Pentax K110D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Pentax K110D |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2006-05-22 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $179 | $1,000 |