Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax H90
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
93 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax H90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 153g - 101 x 65 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax H90 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax H90, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the H90 (12MP) is very close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VR-320 was brought out 18 months later than the H90 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the VR-320 matches up against the H90 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax H90 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 & Pentax Optio H90. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Pentax H90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Pentax H90
| VR-320 | H90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 18 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax H90 over the Olympus VR-320
| H90 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Pentax H90
| VR-320 | H90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax H90 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Pentax H90 has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax H90 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 vs the H90.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and H90 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax H90 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and H90.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to result in more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The younger VR-320 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax H90 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax H90 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Pentax Optio H90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Pentax Optio H90 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Prime |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 153 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 65 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $179 | $150 |