Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Released February 2012
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WG-2 GPS (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-320 was brought out 6 months earlier than the WG-2 GPS and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the VR-320 scores against the WG-2 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
VR-320 | WG-2 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus VR-320
WG-2 GPS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
VR-320 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | February 2012 | Same generation | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 has got physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 GPS has specifications of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 versus the WG-2 GPS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and WG-2 GPS is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and WG-2 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Pentax WG-2 GPS to provide you with greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2012-02-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lb) | 198g (0.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $179 | $300 |