Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
93 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 180g - 98 x 57 x 31mm
- Revealed June 2011
- Replacement is Pentax Q10
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the Q (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-320 was manufactured very close to the Q so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the VR-320 matches up against the Q when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Pentax Q. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Pentax Q Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Pentax Q
| VR-320 | Q |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q over the Olympus VR-320
| Q | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Pentax Q
| VR-320 | Q | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 | June 2011 | Similar generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q has sizing of 98mm x 57mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 versus the Q.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and Q is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and Q.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to deliver more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax Q Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Pentax Q | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Pentax Q |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2011-06-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 57 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 47 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 189 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $179 | $695 |