Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-10
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Pentax WG-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax WG-10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WG-10 (14MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VR-320 was revealed 23 months before the WG-10 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the VR-320 grades against the WG-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Pentax WG-10. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Pentax WG-10
| VR-320 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Olympus VR-320
| WG-10 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 23 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Pentax WG-10
| VR-320 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 provides outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Pentax WG-10 has dimensions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax WG-10 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 against the WG-10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and WG-10 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and WG-10.
All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP so you should expect comparable quality of files although you have to take the production date of the cameras into account. The older VR-320 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography features
Pentax WG-10 Portrait photography features
decent MP (14 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
focusing manually
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
Pentax WG-10 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
Sports photography with Pentax WG-10
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proof
continuous shooting slow (0.7 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
Travel photography with Pentax WG-10
lighter than competitors (158g)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
weather proof
good megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax WG-10 as a Landscape photography camera
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather proof
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
Pentax WG-10 as a Vlogging camera
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic socket
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Pentax WG-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Pentax WG-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2013-06-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 0.7 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 1.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $179 | $0 |