Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Released July 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WG-3 GPS (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-320 was brought out 24 months prior to the WG-3 GPS making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the VR-320 grades versus the WG-3 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 & Pentax WG-3 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| VR-320 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus VR-320
| WG-3 GPS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 | July 2011 | More modern by 24 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| VR-320 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 has exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Pentax WG-3 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 versus the WG-3 GPS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and WG-3 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by checking specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and WG-3 GPS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Pentax WG-3 GPS to give you greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2013-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 238 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $179 | $350 |