Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax X70
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36


71 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax X70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 410g - 110 x 83 x 90mm
- Introduced March 2009

Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax X70 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax X70, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the X70 (12MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The VR-320 was released 2 years after the X70 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax X70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 scores vs the X70 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax X70 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 and Pentax X70. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Pentax X70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Pentax X70
VR-320 | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | March 2009 | More modern by 29 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax X70 over the Olympus VR-320
X70 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Pentax X70
VR-320 | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax X70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 has got external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Pentax X70 has proportions of 110mm x 83mm x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax X70 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 compared to the X70.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and X70 is 94 and 71 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax X70 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and X70.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus VR-320 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger VR-320 will have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax X70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax X70 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Pentax X70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Pentax X70 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-03-02 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 9.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 410g (0.90 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 110 x 83 x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $179 | $200 |