Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Announced February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh CX1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-320 was released 2 years after the CX1 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the VR-320 scores versus the CX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

				

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh CX1

 VR-320 CX1 
AnnouncedJuly 2011February 2009Newer by 30 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus VR-320

 CX1 VR-320 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh CX1

 VR-320 CX1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Neither offers Touch screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 offers external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Examine the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh CX1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 vs the CX1.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and CX1 is 94 and 93 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading specifications. The image below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and CX1.

To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus VR-320 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Portrait photography camera
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
25
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography factors
Ricoh CX1 Street photography factors
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Sports photography camera
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than others in class (158g)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
59
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography advice
42
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
42
focusing manually
rather wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Vlogging camera
32
decently wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
28
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus VR-320Ricoh CX1
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VR-320 Ricoh CX1
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-07-19 2009-02-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-200mm (7.1x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lb) 180 gr (0.40 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $179 $299