Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The VR-320 was announced 24 months later than the CX2 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the VR-320 matches up against the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh CX2

 VR-320 CX2 
LaunchedJuly 2011August 2009Fresher by 24 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus VR-320

 CX2 VR-320 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh CX2

 VR-320 CX2 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 and the CX2.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and CX2 is 94 and 93 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by going over specifications. The graphic below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and CX2.

To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus VR-320 to offer you greater detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX2
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
25
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
resolution not great (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography highlights
Ricoh CX2 Street photography highlights
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (158g)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185 grams)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh CX2 Sports photography highlights
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
Ricoh CX2 Travel photography details
70
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
66
lighter than average (185g)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long reach (300mm)
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Landscape photography camera
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
42
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
resolution not great (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh CX2 Vlogging highlights
32
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic socket
30
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh CX2
 Olympus VR-320Ricoh CX2
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VR-320 Ricoh CX2
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-07-19 2009-08-20
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 gr (0.35 pounds) 185 gr (0.41 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $179 $341