Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Ricoh CX4 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
34
Overall
33

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Revealed August 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and CX4 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The VR-320 was revealed 12 months later than the CX4 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the VR-320 scores vs the CX4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh CX4

 VR-320 CX4 
RevealedJuly 2011August 2010More recent by 12 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus VR-320

 CX4 VR-320 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh CX4

 VR-320 CX4 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 has physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 and the CX4.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and CX4 is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and CX4.

To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to deliver greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Portrait photography camera
33
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
26
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (158g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205g)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography info
Ricoh CX4 Sports photography info
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
24
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography features
Ricoh CX4 Travel photography features
70
lighter than competitors (158g)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
66
lighter than others in class (205g)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography information
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography information
42
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
42
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
Vlogging with Ricoh CX4
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
30
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (205g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh CX4
 Olympus VR-320Ricoh CX4
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-320 Ricoh CX4
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2011-07-19 2010-08-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158g (0.35 pounds) 205g (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $179 $211