Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh G900
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh G900, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and G900 (20MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was launched 7 years earlier than the G900 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the VR-320 matches up vs the G900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Ricoh G900. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh G900
| VR-320 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus VR-320
| G900 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 80 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh G900
| VR-320 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 features exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Ricoh G900 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh G900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the VR-320 compared to the G900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and G900 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and G900.
As you can see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh G900 to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older VR-320 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh G900 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 247 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $179 | $752 |