Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The VR-320 was introduced around the same time to the GR Digital IV and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the VR-320 grades against the GR Digital IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
VR-320 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus VR-320
GR Digital IV | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
VR-320 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | September 2011 | Same generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 comes with physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 against the GR Digital IV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac563/ac563cf53974d475a2977820534c368b7a6fd6bd" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c114/8c11469ce032f5b8a562ec3663d3ea98da46ba3d" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing specifications. The visual here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and GR Digital IV.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50df6/50df68b5791a4e9c60c1d99701157febe86d2568" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7887f/7887fb72445118794b7e20b257164a1b7bd5a725" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $179 | $599 |