Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-320 was introduced 11 months after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the VR-320 grades versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
VR-320 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | September 2010 | Newer by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus VR-320
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
VR-320 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 provides exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus VR-320 will provide extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer VR-320 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $179 | $566 |