Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VR-320 was announced 4 years before the WG-30 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the VR-320 grades versus the WG-30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 & Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh WG-30
| VR-320 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus VR-320
| WG-30 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2014 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 39 months |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30
| VR-320 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 provides outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 versus the WG-30.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and WG-30 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and WG-30.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30 to give greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older VR-320 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 192 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $179 | $428 |