Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released October 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

Below is a thorough review of the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The VR-320 was announced 4 years before the WG-30 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the VR-320 grades versus the WG-30 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh WG-30

 VR-320 WG-30 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus VR-320

 WG-30 VR-320 
ReleasedOctober 2014July 2011More recent by 39 months

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30

 VR-320 WG-30 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 provides outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Compare the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 versus the WG-30.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and WG-30 is 94 and 91 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and WG-30.

As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30 to give greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older VR-320 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-30
33
MP count good (14MP)
has face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
35
good megapixels (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
61
built in image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-30 Sports photography factors
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
45
built in image stabilization (Digital)
good megapixels (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-30 Travel photography info
70
lighter than others in class (158g)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
71
environment sealing
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography features
Ricoh WG-30 Landscape photography features
42
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
43
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
good megapixels (16MP)
environment sealing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-30
32
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
33
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30
 Olympus VR-320Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-320 Ricoh WG-30
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Announced 2011-07-19 2014-10-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lb) 192 gr (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail cost $179 $428