Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Ricoh WG-30W front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Updated by Olympus VR-330
Ricoh WG-30W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Announced October 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30W, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The VR-320 was brought out 4 years earlier than the WG-30W which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the VR-320 matches up versus the WG-30W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh WG-30W

 VR-320 WG-30W 
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus VR-320

 WG-30W VR-320 
AnnouncedOctober 2014July 2011More modern by 39 months

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30W

 VR-320 WG-30W 
Manual focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 offers outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 versus the WG-30W.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and WG-30W is 94 and 91 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The pic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and WG-30W.

All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-30W to render extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-30W
33
MP count good (14MP)
features face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
36
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-320
Street photography with Ricoh WG-30W
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-30W Sports photography factors
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
45
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-30W Travel photography details
70
lighter than competition in class (158g)
MP count good (14MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
71
environment proofing
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-30W
42
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
43
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
decent megapixels (16MP)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-30W
32
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic support
33
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-30W
 Olympus VR-320Ricoh WG-30W
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-320 Ricoh WG-30W
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Released 2011-07-19 2014-10-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lbs) 194 grams (0.43 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $179 $280