Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VR-320 was released 3 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the VR-320 matches up vs the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
VR-320 | WG-4 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus VR-320
WG-4 GPS | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | July 2011 | Newer by 31 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
VR-320 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 and the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $179 | $210 |