Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • New Model is Olympus VR-330
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Announced February 2014
  • New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The VR-320 was released 3 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the VR-320 matches up vs the WG-4 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 VR-320 WG-4 GPS 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus VR-320

 WG-4 GPS VR-320 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014July 2011Newer by 31 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 VR-320 WG-4 GPS 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 and the WG-4 GPS.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and WG-4 GPS.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography factors
33
good MP (14MP)
has face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
41
you can focus manually
good resolution (16MP)
supports face detect focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography information
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than others in class (235g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
weather sealing
max fps low (2.0 fps)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (240 per charge)
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than competition (158g)
good MP (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
69
weather sealing
good resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery life (240 per charge)
heavier than others in class (235g)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
42
decently wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
54
you can focus manually
relatively wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery life (240 per charge)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging highlights
32
decently wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
34
relatively wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of mic socket
heavier than others in class (235g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Olympus VR-320Ricoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VR-320 Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Introduced 2011-07-19 2014-02-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT Color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lb) 235 gr (0.52 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $179 $210