Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-320 was unveiled 9 years prior to the WG-70 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the VR-320 scores against the WG-70 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Ricoh WG-70
| VR-320 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus VR-320
| WG-70 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 104 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Ricoh WG-70
| VR-320 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 has got exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 against the WG-70.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and WG-70 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and WG-70.
All in all, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to give you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VR-320 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $179 | $280 |