Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ10W
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Other Name is WB500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus VR-320 versus Samsung HZ10W, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and HZ10W (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-320 was brought out 2 years after the HZ10W which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the VR-320 matches up versus the HZ10W for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ10W. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung HZ10W
| VR-320 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 27 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus VR-320
| HZ10W | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ10W
| VR-320 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 versus Samsung HZ10W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 versus the HZ10W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and HZ10W is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The picture here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and HZ10W.
As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to produce extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $179 | $300 |
