Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ15W
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Other Name is WB550
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus VR-320 versus Samsung HZ15W, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VR-320 was brought out 2 years later than the HZ15W and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the VR-320 grades versus the HZ15W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ15W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung HZ15W
| VR-320 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus VR-320
| HZ15W | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ15W
| VR-320 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 has external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ15W has sizing of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 versus Samsung HZ15W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 compared to the HZ15W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and HZ15W is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and HZ15W.
As you can see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to offer you more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer VR-320 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Other name | - | WB550 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 249 grams (0.55 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $179 | $330 |