Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f52/d4f52e39beb092353224512dc646b19cc509cfae" alt="Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front"
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ50W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is fairly close and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The VR-320 was manufactured 15 months after the HZ50W making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the VR-320 grades against the HZ50W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ50W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung HZ50W
VR-320 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | May 2010 | More modern by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus VR-320
HZ50W | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ50W
VR-320 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 has got external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ50W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung HZ50W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 vs the HZ50W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fead/9fead49ecc0b3f21677a6e94704c9924488a7b6e" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and HZ50W is 94 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5be7c/5be7cda9f93227499ba6ef8f138a450694ed767c" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and HZ50W.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of files however you will want to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The younger VR-320 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/accce/accced377e3a345994042e867a37cb46fa488fa6" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/579a6/579a6d7e9668e94434143e3764885792ad29322a" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung HZ50W |
Also called as | - | WB5500 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2010-05-03 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 426g (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $179 | $250 |