Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Released November 2013
- Replaced the Samsung NX210
- New Model is Samsung NX500
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-320 was announced 3 years earlier than the NX300 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the VR-320 scores versus the NX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung NX300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung NX300
VR-320 | NX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus VR-320
NX300 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 28 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 768k | 230k | Sharper display (+538k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung NX300
VR-320 | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 versus the NX300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and NX300 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and NX300.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung NX300 will result in greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2013-11-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 768k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 331g (0.73 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $179 | $750 |