Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Samsung NX300 front
Portability
86
Imaging
63
Features
73
Overall
67

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Released November 2013
  • Replaced the Samsung NX210
  • New Model is Samsung NX500
Photography Glossary

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Overview

The following is a complete overview of the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The VR-320 was announced 3 years earlier than the NX300 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the VR-320 scores versus the NX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung NX300

 VR-320 NX300 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus VR-320

 NX300 VR-320 
ReleasedNovember 2013July 2011Newer by 28 months
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3.3"3"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution768k230kSharper display (+538k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung NX300

 VR-320 NX300 
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 versus the NX300.

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and NX300 is 94 and 86 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and NX300.

As you can tell, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung NX300 will result in greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography advice
Samsung NX300 Portrait photography advice
33
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has face detection focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
77
you can focus manually
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
Samsung NX300 as a Street photography camera
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
80
screen tilts up and down
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
supports touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography highlights
Samsung NX300 Sports photography highlights
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
73
high shutter speed (1/6,000 seconds)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography features
Samsung NX300 Travel photography features
70
lighter than others (158g)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
67
supports touch to focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
Landscape photography with Samsung NX300
42
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
72
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Samsung NX mount)
nice screen size (3.3 inch)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging highlights
Samsung NX300 Vlogging highlights
32
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
lighter than others (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
33
touchscreen enabled
features face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung NX300
 Olympus VR-320Samsung NX300
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus VR-320 Samsung NX300
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2011-07-19 2013-11-24
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III DRIMe IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 247
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Total lenses - 32
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3.3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 768k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT Color LCD Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/6000s
Continuous shutter rate - 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158g (0.35 pounds) 331g (0.73 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 76
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.7
DXO Low light score not tested 942
Other
Battery life - 330 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $179 $750