Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung TL500
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Other Name is EX1
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus VR-320 versus Samsung TL500, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VR-320 was revealed 13 months after the TL500 making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the VR-320 grades vs the TL500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 & Samsung TL500. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung TL500
| VR-320 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | July 2010 | Newer by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Olympus VR-320
| TL500 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung TL500
| VR-320 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 features outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-320 versus Samsung TL500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the VR-320 and the TL500.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and TL500 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The image below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and TL500.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus VR-320 will offer extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung TL500 |
| Also called as | - | EX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-07-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 386 gr (0.85 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $179 | $527 |