Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-320 was manufactured very close to the WB210 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the VR-320 matches up against the WB210 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung WB210
| VR-320 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 1k | Crisper screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Olympus VR-320
| WB210 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung WB210
| VR-320 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 | July 2011 | Same generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the VR-320 against the WB210.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and WB210 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and WB210.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs however you need to take the production date of the cameras into account.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 174 grams (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $179 | $279 |