Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB30F
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung WB30F, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe VR-320 was brought out 17 months earlier than the WB30F making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the VR-320 grades against the WB30F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 & Samsung WB30F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung WB30F
VR-320 | WB30F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Olympus VR-320
WB30F | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | July 2011 | Fresher by 17 months |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung WB30F
VR-320 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 features outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung WB30F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 against the WB30F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and WB30F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and WB30F.
As you can see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB30F to provide more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung WB30F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 128 grams (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $179 | $180 |