Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is fairly comparable and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-320 was introduced about the same time to the WB750 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the VR-320 scores against the WB750 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Samsung WB750. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Samsung WB750
| VR-320 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Olympus VR-320
| WB750 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Samsung WB750
| VR-320 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | September 2011 | Same generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 compared to the WB750.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and WB750 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and WB750.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to produce extra detail using its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-320 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Samsung WB750 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $179 | $339 |