Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sigma DP1 Merrill front
Portability
82
Imaging
55
Features
30
Overall
45

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Sigma DP1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • ()mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
  • Introduced February 2012
  • Later Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview

Lets examine more closely at the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty well matched but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-320 was brought out 6 months prior to the DP1 Merrill so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the VR-320 grades vs the DP1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill

 VR-320 DP1 Merrill 
Screen sizing3""Bigger screen (+3")

Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Olympus VR-320

 DP1 Merrill VR-320 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill

 VR-320 DP1 Merrill 
IntroducedJuly 2011February 2012Similar generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 has got external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Examine the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-320 against the DP1 Merrill.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The visual below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and DP1 Merrill.

As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will resolve extra detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography factors
Sigma DP1 Merrill Portrait photography factors
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
73
has manual focus
good MP (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography features
Sigma DP1 Merrill Street photography features
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
64
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP1 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
47
good MP (15MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
Sigma DP1 Merrill Travel photography info
70
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
decent MP (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
53
good MP (15MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma DP1 Merrill Landscape photography highlights
42
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
50
has manual focus
good MP (15 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen ( inches)
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging highlights
Sigma DP1 Merrill Vlogging highlights
32
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
lighter than average in class (158g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
21
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
 Olympus VR-320Sigma DP1 Merrill
General Information
Brand Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus VR-320 Sigma DP1 Merrill
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-07-19 2012-02-08
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 15 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4704 x 3136
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) ()
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch -
Display resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158g (0.35 lbs) 330g (0.73 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC -
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $179 $1,250