Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Later Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is pretty well matched but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was brought out 6 months prior to the DP1 Merrill so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the VR-320 grades vs the DP1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
| VR-320 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Olympus VR-320
| DP1 Merrill | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
| VR-320 | DP1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 | February 2012 | Similar generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 has got external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP1 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-320 against the DP1 Merrill.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The visual below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and DP1 Merrill.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will resolve extra detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | - |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $179 | $1,250 |