Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
88 Imaging
44 Features
27 Overall
37
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 28mm (F4.0) lens
- 250g - 113 x 60 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP1s
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and DP1x (5MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and DP1x (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was announced 18 months later than the DP1x making them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the VR-320 grades vs the DP1x with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1x. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sigma DP1x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sigma DP1x
| VR-320 | DP1x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 | February 2010 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1x over the Olympus VR-320
| DP1x | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP1x
| VR-320 | DP1x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 has got physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP1x has proportions of 113mm x 60mm x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the VR-320 against the DP1x.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and DP1x is 94 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The graphic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and DP1x.
To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 using its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus VR-320 will offer extra detail with its extra 9MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP1x Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Sigma DP1x | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sigma DP1x |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 5MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/4.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 320x240 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 60 x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $179 | $574 |