Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus VR-320 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe VR-320 was brought out 3 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 scores against the DP2 Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| VR-320 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus VR-320
| DP2 Quattro | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 | July 2011 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| VR-320 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-320 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and DP2 Quattro is 94 and 70 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 395 grams (0.87 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $179 | $931 |