Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus VR-320 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The VR-320 was brought out 3 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 scores against the DP2 Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VR-320 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus VR-320

 DP2 Quattro VR-320 
IntroducedFebruary 2014July 2011Fresher by 31 months
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VR-320 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 comes with outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus VR-320 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and DP2 Quattro is 94 and 70 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
33
resolution is good (14MP)
comes with face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
77
focusing manually
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography details
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
61
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography details
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
47
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
53
good resolution (20MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
42
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
59
focusing manually
screen is a good size (3 inches)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
32
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
9
no video recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus VR-320Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus VR-320 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-07-19 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 45mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lbs) 395 grams (0.87 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC -
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $179 $931