Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Announced January 2013
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2 Merrill
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is very close but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe VR-320 was launched 17 months earlier than the DP3 Merrill making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the VR-320 scores vs the DP3 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP3 Merrill. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
| VR-320 | DP3 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Olympus VR-320
| DP3 Merrill | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 17 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
| VR-320 | DP3 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sigma DP3 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the VR-320 versus the DP3 Merrill.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and DP3 Merrill is 94 and 83 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and DP3 Merrill.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VR-320 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 75mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 330g (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $179 | $1,353 |