Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A200
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Announced July 2008
- Successor is Sony A230
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A200 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and A200 (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe VR-320 was released 3 years after the A200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the VR-320 grades against the A200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony A200
VR-320 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | July 2008 | Newer by 37 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus VR-320
A200 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A200
VR-320 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 features outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony A200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the VR-320 and the A200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and A200 is 94 and 66 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The image below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and A200.
As you can tell, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus VR-320 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger VR-320 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2008-07-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 572 gr (1.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $179 | $100 |