Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • Successor is Sony A330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony A300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and A300 (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The VR-320 was announced 3 years after the A300 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the VR-320 matches up against the A300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony A300

 VR-320 A300 
RevealedJuly 2011January 2008Newer by 43 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus VR-320

 A300 VR-320 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A300

 VR-320 A300 
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 offers outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony A300 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Look at the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony A300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 against the A300.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and A300 is 94 and 64 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and A300.

As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus VR-320 will show extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A300 as a Portrait photography camera
33
resolution is good (14MP)
supports face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
59
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (10MP)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-320
Street photography with Sony A300
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
74
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography info
Sony A300 Sports photography info
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography highlights
Sony A300 Travel photography highlights
70
lighter than competitors (158g)
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
45
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A300 as a Landscape photography camera
42
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
57
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
Sony A300 Vlogging features
32
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
lighter than competitors (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone jack
9
no video shooting
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony A300
 Olympus VR-320Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VR-320 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2011-07-19 2008-01-30
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Available lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lb) 632 grams (1.39 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 538
Other
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC Compact Flash
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $179 $0