Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
62 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Later Model is Sony A380
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A350, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the A350 (14MP) is fairly similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was announced 3 years later than the A350 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the VR-320 matches up against the A350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony A350
VR-320 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | June 2008 | More recent by 38 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus VR-320
A350 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A350
VR-320 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony A350 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-320 versus the A350.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and A350 is 94 and 62 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading technical specs. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and A350.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The VR-320 has the tinier sensor which should make achieving bokeh more challenging. The more recent VR-320 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2008-06-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 674g (1.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $179 | $600 |