Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Updated by Olympus VR-330
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Later Model is Sony A380
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Overview

Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A350, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the A350 (14MP) is fairly similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-320 was announced 3 years later than the A350 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the VR-320 matches up against the A350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony A350

 VR-320 A350 
IntroducedJuly 2011June 2008More recent by 38 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus VR-320

 A350 VR-320 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A350

 VR-320 A350 
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony A350 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Compare the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-320 versus the A350.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and A350 is 94 and 62 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading technical specs. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and A350.

As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The VR-320 has the tinier sensor which should make achieving bokeh more challenging. The more recent VR-320 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography information
Sony A350 Portrait photography information
33
good resolution (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
71
has manual focus
decent MP (14MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-320
Street photography with Sony A350
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
66
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (674g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography highlights
Sony A350 Sports photography highlights
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography factors
Sony A350 Travel photography factors
70
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
good resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
51
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (674 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A350 as a Landscape photography camera
42
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
64
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging highlights
Sony A350 Vlogging highlights
32
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
lighter than average in class (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
9
lack of video recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony A350
 Olympus VR-320Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VR-320 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2011-07-19 2008-06-06
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158g (0.35 pounds) 674g (1.49 pounds)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $179 $600