Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3 front
Portability
89
Imaging
54
Features
55
Overall
54

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • New Model is Olympus VR-330
Sony NEX-3
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Replacement is Sony NEX-C3
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview

Following is a extended overview of the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the NEX-3 (14MP) is very comparable but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and NEX-3 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The VR-320 was introduced 14 months after the NEX-3 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 scores against the NEX-3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony NEX-3

 VR-320 NEX-3 
RevealedJuly 2011June 2010More modern by 14 months

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus VR-320

 NEX-3 VR-320 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony NEX-3

 VR-320 NEX-3 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 offers outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3 has specifications of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).

See the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-320 versus the NEX-3.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and NEX-3 is 94 and 89 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The image below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and NEX-3.

As you can see, both the cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The VR-320 features the smaller sensor which will make getting bokeh trickier. The younger VR-320 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography features
Sony NEX-3 Portrait photography features
33
good megapixels (14MP)
offers face detection focus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
72
has manual focus
decent MP (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-3 as a Street photography camera
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (158g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
76
tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-3 as a Sports photography camera
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
52
decent MP (14MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
Sony NEX-3 Travel photography info
70
lighter than average (158g)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
59
decent MP (14MP)
does not have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony NEX-3 as a Landscape photography camera
42
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Timelapse function
68
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
decent MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging factors
Sony NEX-3 Vlogging factors
32
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
lighter than average (158g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone jack
27
offers face detection focus
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony NEX-3
 Olympus VR-320Sony Alpha NEX-3
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VR-320 Sony Alpha NEX-3
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2011-07-19 2010-06-07
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Number of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology TFT Color LCD TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 7.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 12.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 lbs) 297 gr (0.65 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 68
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.0
DXO Low light score not tested 830
Other
Battery life - 330 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images))
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $179 $0