Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX1
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched April 2009
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX1 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX1, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and HX1 (1/2.4") posses different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was brought out 2 years later than the HX1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the VR-320 scores against the HX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony HX1
VR-320 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | April 2009 | More recent by 28 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus VR-320
HX1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX1
VR-320 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 has got outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony HX1 has dimensions of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the VR-320 against the HX1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and HX1 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and HX1.
As you can see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will render extra detail having its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-04-22 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 9.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 544g (1.20 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $179 | $47,999 |