Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX200V
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched May 2012
- Previous Model is Sony HX100V
- Refreshed by Sony HX300
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and HX200V (18MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VR-320 was introduced 9 months before the HX200V which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the VR-320 grades vs the HX200V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony HX200V
VR-320 | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus VR-320
HX200V | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | July 2011 | Newer by 9 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX200V
VR-320 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 has outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-320 versus the HX200V.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and HX200V is 94 and 66 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by looking at technical specs. The image below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and HX200V.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony HX200V to give you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2012-05-11 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 12.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 583 grams (1.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $179 | $480 |