Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Earlier Model is Sony HX200V
- Updated by Sony HX400V
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and HX300 (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was revealed 19 months prior to the HX300 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the VR-320 grades vs the HX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony HX300
VR-320 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus VR-320
HX300 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2013 | July 2011 | More recent by 19 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX300
VR-320 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony HX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 compared to the HX300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and HX300 is 94 and 63 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and HX300.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony HX300 to show more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 623g (1.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $179 | $339 |