Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
51
Overall
47

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Earlier Model is Sony HX200V
  • Updated by Sony HX400V
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and HX300 (20MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The VR-320 was revealed 19 months prior to the HX300 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the VR-320 grades vs the HX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony HX300

 VR-320 HX300 

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus VR-320

 HX300 VR-320 
IntroducedFebruary 2013July 2011More recent by 19 months
Manual focus More precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX300

 VR-320 HX300 
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Check the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony HX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the VR-320 compared to the HX300.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and HX300 is 94 and 63 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and HX300.

Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony HX300 to show more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography highlights
Sony HX300 Portrait photography highlights
33
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
features face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
43
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography advice
Sony HX300 Street photography advice
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
50
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than average (623 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography details
Sony HX300 Sports photography details
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20MP)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
Travel photography with Sony HX300
70
lighter than competition in class (158g)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
54
good resolution (20MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (623g)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
Landscape photography with Sony HX300
42
pretty wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
49
you can focus manually
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
Sony HX300 Vlogging features
32
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone support
25
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic support
heavier than average (623g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX300
 Olympus VR-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VR-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-07-19 2013-02-20
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158g (0.35 lbs) 623g (1.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC -
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $179 $339