Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX99
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced September 2018
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX99 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony HX99, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-320 was released 8 years before the HX99 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the VR-320 matches up against the HX99 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony HX99
VR-320 | HX99 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Olympus VR-320
HX99 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | July 2011 | More recent by 86 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony HX99
VR-320 | HX99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3.00" | Same screen measurements |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 has physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony HX99 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony HX99 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the VR-320 against the HX99.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and HX99 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The visual below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and HX99.
To sum up, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony HX99 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older VR-320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2018-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3.00 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 242 gr (0.53 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $179 | $469 |