Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX1
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Announced February 2013
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX1 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus VR-320 and Sony RX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was announced 19 months before the RX1 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the VR-320 grades versus the RX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony RX1
VR-320 | RX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus VR-320
RX1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2013 | July 2011 | More modern by 19 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Crisper screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony RX1
VR-320 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 has outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony RX1 has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
See the Olympus VR-320 and Sony RX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the VR-320 versus the RX1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and RX1 is 94 and 79 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through specifications. The pic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and RX1.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony RX1 will render more detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2013-02-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-22.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lb) | 482g (1.06 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 93 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $179 | $2,798 |