Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic S1R
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
54 Imaging
79 Features
84 Overall
81
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic S1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1020g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Released February 2019
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic S1R Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic S1R, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and S1R (47MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and S1R (Full frame) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 III was launched 17 months prior to the S1R making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M10 III grades against the S1R with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic S1R Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Panasonic S1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic S1R
E-M10 III | S1R |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1R over the Olympus E-M10 III
S1R | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2019 | August 2017 | More modern by 17 months | |
Display size | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 2100k | 1040k | Crisper display (+1060k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic S1R
E-M10 III | S1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic S1R Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III has got outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Panasonic S1R has sizing of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") with a weight of 1020 grams (2.25 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III versus Panasonic S1R in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 III against the S1R.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and S1R is 80 and 54 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic S1R Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to see the gap between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and S1R.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III due to its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Panasonic S1R will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 31 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 III is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic S1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic S1R Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2019-02-01 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 47MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 8000 x 6000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Number of lenses | 107 | 30 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 2,100k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 5,760k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/320 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 1020g (2.25 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3525 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 360 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | - |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Price at release | $650 | $3,698 |