Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Sony S950
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Photography Glossary

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 Overview

Here, we are matching up the Olympus VR-320 and Sony S950, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and S950 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VR-320 was announced 2 years later than the S950 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the VR-320 matches up against the S950 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony S950

 VR-320 S950 
IntroducedJuly 2011February 2009More recent by 30 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Olympus VR-320

 S950 VR-320 
Manually focus Very exact focus

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony S950

 VR-320 S950 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony S950 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Olympus VR-320 and Sony S950 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 compared to the S950.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and S950 is 94 and 94 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The photograph below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and S950.

To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to provide extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher VR-320 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography highlights
Sony S950 Portrait photography highlights
33
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
26
focusing manually
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-320
Street photography with Sony S950
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography information
Sony S950 Sports photography information
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
24
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow frames per second (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography advice
Sony S950 Travel photography advice
70
lighter than average in class (158g)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
Landscape photography with Sony S950
42
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
31
focusing manually
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging features
Sony S950 Vlogging features
32
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone port
9
no video shooting
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony S950 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony S950
 Olympus VR-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VR-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-07-19 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) 33-132mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing range 1cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158g (0.35 lbs) 167g (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $179 $130