Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") provide different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-320 was unveiled 24 months after the TX1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the VR-320 matches up vs the TX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony TX1
| VR-320 | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 | August 2009 | More modern by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus VR-320
| TX1 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony TX1
| VR-320 | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony TX1 has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 compared to the TX1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and TX1 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and TX1.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will offer you more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-08-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 142 gr (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $179 | $350 |