Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") provide different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VR-320 was unveiled 24 months after the TX1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the VR-320 matches up vs the TX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony TX1
| VR-320 | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 | August 2009 | More modern by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus VR-320
| TX1 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony TX1
| VR-320 | TX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony TX1 has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 compared to the TX1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and TX1 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and TX1.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will offer you more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-08-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 8cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 142 gr (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $179 | $350 |