Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") provide different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VR-320 was unveiled 24 months after the TX1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the VR-320 matches up vs the TX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony TX1
VR-320 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | August 2009 | More modern by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus VR-320
TX1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony TX1
VR-320 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony TX1 has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 compared to the TX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and TX1 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and TX1.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will offer you more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2009-08-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1250s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 142 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $179 | $350 |