Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
95 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2011
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the TX100V (16MP) is very close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-320 was released 7 months after the TX100V so they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short view of how the VR-320 scores vs the TX100V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony TX100V
VR-320 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | January 2011 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Olympus VR-320
TX100V | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer display (+999k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony TX100V
VR-320 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 features outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony TX100V has dimensions of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 against the TX100V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and TX100V is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and TX100V.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony TX100V to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent VR-320 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX100V Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 147g (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $179 | $380 |