Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Launched July 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the TX9 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was unveiled 13 months after the TX9 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the VR-320 matches up against the TX9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The full galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony TX9
| VR-320 | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | July 2010 | More modern by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus VR-320
| TX9 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony TX9
| VR-320 | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VR-320 features outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony TX9 has proportions of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") and a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 vs the TX9.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and TX9 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The image here should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and TX9.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus VR-320 to produce greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern VR-320 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony TX9 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-07-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 149 grams (0.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $179 | $799 |