Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Sony W230
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the W230 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The VR-320 was released 2 years later than the W230 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the VR-320 matches up against the W230 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony W230

 VR-320 W230 
IntroducedJuly 2011February 2009More recent by 30 months

Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Olympus VR-320

 W230 VR-320 
Manual focus Very precise focusing

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony W230

 VR-320 W230 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony W230 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Examine the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 versus the W230.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and W230 is 94 and 95 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The photograph here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and W230.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus VR-320 to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer VR-320 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
Sony W230 Portrait photography details
33
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
27
has manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
Sony W230 as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography information
Sony W230 Sports photography information
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
Travel photography with Sony W230
70
lighter than others in class (158g)
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography features
Sony W230 Landscape photography features
42
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
36
has manual focus
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
Vlogging with Sony W230
32
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
lighter than others in class (158g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone socket
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony W230
 Olympus VR-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VR-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-07-19 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 30-120mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focus range 1cm 4cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 3.90 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lb) 156 grams (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $179 $180