Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff5ca/ff5caf377fb11e53f611247775d9e8797c900ab4" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the W230 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The VR-320 was released 2 years later than the W230 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the VR-320 matches up against the W230 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sony W230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony W230
VR-320 | W230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Olympus VR-320
W230 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony W230
VR-320 | W230 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony W230 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 versus the W230.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4145/c4145918e1c6a3a5a3ed72aeb67a1d20a76b1415" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and W230 is 94 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b428f/b428f0b4b856f54d0ff86cfa91ba3b10f6d1580c" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The photograph here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and W230.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus VR-320 to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer VR-320 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/218d4/218d42136714623d6cddfcfeec67eb8585a9585a" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4d01/a4d01edff5b05b16311cdcb73953496e152272ba" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W230 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lb) | 156 grams (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $179 | $180 |