Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Sony W350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 Overview

The following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony W350, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the W350 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-320 was launched 19 months after the W350 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the VR-320 grades vs the W350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony W350

 VR-320 W350 
ReleasedJuly 2011January 2010Newer by 19 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Olympus VR-320

 W350 VR-320 

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony W350

 VR-320 W350 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 has got exterior dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony W350 has measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus VR-320 versus Sony W350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the VR-320 versus the W350.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and W350 is 94 and 97 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and W350.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels so you should expect similar quality of images though you should always take the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent VR-320 provides a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
Portrait photography with Sony W350
33
good resolution (14MP)
has face detection focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
28
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
Sony W350 Street photography information
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
58
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W350 as a Sports photography camera
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
34
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
slow fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VR-320
Travel photography with Sony W350
70
lighter than competitors (158g)
good resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.0)
66
good megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (26mm)
no Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography advice
Sony W350 Landscape photography advice
42
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
37
quite wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging factors
Sony W350 Vlogging factors
32
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
lighter than competitors (158 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic port
29
quite wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VR-320 vs Sony W350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Sony W350
 Olympus VR-320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VR-320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Revealed 2011-07-19 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-5.9 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 3.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 grams (0.35 lbs) 117 grams (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model LI-42B NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $179 $200