Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b542c/b542c5c337124cb9064ac61be013cd44a2f7b014" alt="Sony SLT-A37 front Sony SLT-A37 front"
67 Imaging
57 Features
65 Overall
60
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.6" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 506g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Launched May 2012
- Older Model is Sony A35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A37, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the A37 (16MP) is fairly similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and A37 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The VR-320 was released 10 months before the A37 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Sony A37 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the VR-320 matches up against the A37 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Sony SLT-A37. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Sony A37 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Sony A37
VR-320 | A37 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.6" | Larger display (+0.4") |
Reasons to pick Sony A37 over the Olympus VR-320
A37 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 10 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A37
VR-320 | A37 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony A37 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 506 grams (1.12 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-320 and Sony A37 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 and the A37.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faed1/faed18b44fcccf8f400b25c873c158cf94933888" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and A37 is 94 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe5e8/fe5e8b992f919b023c1d5b9ee88d24ba509a59c8" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and A37.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A37 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older VR-320 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14f89/14f89a86b0b0c8218cc86a425e027a6f6b790b17" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77f3a/77f3ab3b7b7f196cacc7ac4a6d1b201985472c1a" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Sony A37 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Sony SLT-A37 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Sony SLT-A37 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2012-05-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.6 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 506 gr (1.12 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 799 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $179 | $522 |