Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus VR-330 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the VR-330 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very close but the VR-330 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The VR-330 was revealed 22 months prior to the XZ-2 iHS making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the VR-330 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-330 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-330 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VR-330 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus VR-330
XZ-2 iHS | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 22 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-330 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VR-330 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-330 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-330 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the VR-330 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9233e/9233e097f37f4b1e120ae81f384e97e85c1caf33" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-330 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65814/6581457a9c08f8eea8cbbb20510d78edc8548274" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-330 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VR-330 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus VR-330 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older VR-330 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89bcd/89bcd3f624b6543cf999975ad1d295fde7e787ce" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bab8f/bab8fe671d923cfab63249badac6f26ab6f99e5b" alt="Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-330 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus VR-330 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus VR-330 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $220 | $450 |